Every report. Every requirement. Connected.

The B2B review workspace for environmental and technical consulting firms. Bring your reports, evidence and project requirements together. Prepare amendments, manage RFIs and keep professional decisions connected across every revision.

Built for consulting firms
One B2B workspace for environmental, planning and specialist technical reports.
Requirements in context
Maintained NSW source packs and your project-specific requirements. Keep jurisdiction and applicability explicit.
Your evidence stays attached
Preserve the original report and trace proposed changes to extracted source passages.
Your judgement stays in control
Record decisions, retain technical follow-ups and hand over a reviewable pack.

A report can need more than new wording. Keep the requirement, evidence and remaining technical work together.

Follow the evidencePre-authored synthetic example
Choose a source to explore its evidence.
  1. 01

    A changed requirement.

    A new rule, consent condition or client brief can affect several specialist reports. Keep the source, applicability and required follow-up connected.

  2. 02

    A revised report.

    New evidence can make yesterday’s review stale. Start a new source revision and explicitly reconfirm each decision.

  3. 03

    Another round of questions.

    Track each regulator or client question, assign an owner and due date, and prepare a response grounded in the current evidence.

A clearer path from source evidence to professional handover.

From an existing draft to a reviewable handover.

Upload the report. Examine the review register. Prepare and edit amendments. Record the decisions and accuracy check. Export the evidence, the changes and the work still open.

  1. 01

    Preserve the source

    Readable PDF, DOCX or text becomes a source-linked register. Original documents remain available.

  2. 02

    Review the changes

    Use AI-assisted observations or work manually. Check each requirement and distinguish wording from technical assessment.

  3. 03

    Record the handover

    Named dispositions and an accuracy check unlock the pack. New evidence starts a fresh review.

Walk through the synthetic example

The review work, ready to use.

One workflow across disciplines. Maintained source packs where available, source-linked custom requirements everywhere else.

  • Start with a common QA checklist, add relevant discipline packs and bring the actual requirements for any other report.

  • Locate the report passage behind an observation and open the official supporting requirement.

  • Prepare bounded changes with the original evidence beside them. Edit the wording before recording your decision.

  • Assign evidence gaps, specialist work and regulator questions to an owner. Record due dates, responses and evidence-backed resolution.

  • Save review versions and retain the previous source fingerprints and decisions when the report changes.

  • Download PDF, Word, accessible HTML and JSON with the current evidence, decisions, open work and AI-use record.

The big assessments. The small reports. The work between them.

Use the same evidence, requirement and review workflow for every report type. Eight maintained NSW packs add relevant source prompts; other reports use your uploaded brief, standards, approvals and regulator questions.

Air quality & odour

Final NSW EPA Methods 2026; planning transition 9 October 2026

Official source

Noise & acoustics

Industry policy 2017 and measurement Methods 2022; select the applicable regime

Official source

Water & wastewater

Sampling/analysis Methods 2022; project licence and discharge conditions control

Official source

Contaminated land & PFAS

Reporting guidelines 2020; EPA recommends PFAS NEMP 3.1 (2026)

Official source

Waste & resource recovery

Classification guidelines and current orders/exemptions; material-specific checks

Official source

Ecology & biodiversity

BAM 2020 and official tools; accredited assessment remains separate

Official source

Climate & emissions

NSW EPA licensee requirements; eligibility and staged dates need confirmation

Official source

Planning & environmental management

Project-specific assessment requirements, approvals and management commitments

Official source
Explore specialist report types
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Technical review / due diligence
  • Noise impact assessment
  • Construction noise & vibration
  • Air quality / odour assessment
  • Surface water / groundwater
  • Stormwater / drainage
  • Flood risk assessment
  • Contaminated land investigation
  • Remediation action plan
  • Validation report
  • PFAS assessment
  • Waste management plan
  • Waste classification
  • Resource recovery assessment
  • Flora & fauna / biodiversity
  • Vegetation management
  • Arborist / tree report
  • Bushfire assessment
  • Heritage / archaeology
  • Traffic / transport / parking
  • Geotechnical / soil assessment
  • Erosion & sediment control
  • Acid sulfate soils
  • Environmental management plan
  • Construction management plan
  • Operational management plan
  • Monitoring / annual report
  • Audit / inspection report
  • Climate / carbon assessment
  • Sustainability report
  • Social impact assessment
  • Landscape / visual impact
  • Lighting / glare assessment
  • Hazard / risk assessment
  • Planning statement
  • Regulator RFI response
  • Other specialist report

Outside maintained pack coverage, Knoy organises and reviews your supplied requirements. It does not assume local laws, run specialist models or replace accredited assessment.

Mangrove channels braiding through a tidal estuary

Clear evidence. Considered decisions.

Built around the way your firm works.

For consultants preparing reports, technical directors checking them and project teams coordinating the response.

Review noise, air, water, land, waste, ecology and the smaller specialist reports that keep projects moving.

See what was proposed, what was checked and what still needs technical work before the next handover.

Send a consistent review pack into the wider project, with open matters and professional responsibilities visible.

Professionals make the technical judgement.

Knoy prepares review work. Qualified professionals establish applicability, verify evidence, perform the technical assessment and approve the report.

A reviewed amendment is not a completed technical assessment.
Open technical work, unresolved questions and proposed changes remain visible in the review and exported handover.
  • Original evidence retainedUploaded files remain available beside extracted text and source fingerprints.Review control
  • Quotations checkedAI report quotations must match uploaded text before they are saved.Review control
  • Explicit reviewer decisionsA disposition, reviewer and rationale are required for every topic.Review control
  • Changes reopen the reviewNew sources and fresh AI analysis invalidate previous dispositions and the final accuracy check.Review control
  • Export gatesThe pack records current decisions and carries unresolved technical work forward.Review control

Automated support covers text extraction, literal source matching and AI-assisted review proposals. It does not independently verify every numeric criterion, diagram or technical conclusion.

Know what is processed

AI review sends extracted source text and the review brief to Anthropic. Confirm your organisation’s confidentiality, processor and retention requirements before uploading restricted material. Read our privacy approach.

Source packs are maintained review prompts, not exhaustive legal or technical verification. They distinguish final rules, existing standards and project-specific requirements. Current source review: 24 October 2026.

Bring the report. Keep your judgement.

Start with a short report or a multidisciplinary project. Keep the requirements, people and remaining work in view.